Module 10 "A Logic Named Joe"

A Logic Named Joe

That was written in 1946? Whoever wrote it really had an imagination about computers.  Especially since computers in the 40’s and 50’s were super different.  Luckily, our society has not gotten to such an extreme point like the one in the story, yet.  Just like in the story, anyone could ask their logics questions they didn’t know the answer to, we too can ask internet search engines questions, and they give us the answers. Unlike Joe’s answers, the answers we get aren’t always true and simple. Search engines just list off websites that have material related to the question. And those websites that pop up are created by people who could or could not be professionals, thus we have to sort through every webpage or website to find what we are really searching for, and when we find it, it’s not a simple step-by-step answer, if we even do find something.

            In this short story it was the computer - Joe - who did most of the thinking.  Joe looked up the information and Joe did the logic to manipulate all the information into a simple answer, even teenagers could understand.  Little kids could counterfeit and find treasure with Joe’s instructions.  Even a drunk could get sober heeding Joe’s solution. Adults wanted to know how to tell if their spouses were faithful to them, and what to do if they weren’t.  Joe could bring up dirt about anybody’s past.  Neighbors could take a peek into the lives of each other and find out each other’s history, the good and the bad.  It’s a small relief to know that our computers definitely cannot think like Joe.  What we can do is Google a person and we might find what social media they use, or even if they have committed some kind of felony and other personal information like phone numbers or addresses.  We analyze the information we get on the internet.  Our computers are just the tool we use to come up with the information.  Besides, not every bit of information on the internet can be analyzed by a human being, that would take days on end.  Joe, on the other hand could look at all the data in the tank and in seconds, come up with a simplified answer, and deliver the message to the user.

Joe was not a bad computer.  Joe did his job the best he could, and he was really good at it too.  In the story, the humans corrupted the system. The problem wasn’t that Joe could get information on anything, the problem was how corrupt the humans got asking Joe to solve their problems. Asking questions on how to rob banks, murder wives, make a ton of money quick, and more!  Like they couldn’t solve their problems on their own.  Maybe they just needed a computer to validate their bad decisions.  Maybe they thought it was OK to do all of those bad things when their Logics told them how to do it.  After all aren’t Logics supposed to help their users and give them the best solutions?  They wanted a quick solution to erase their mistakes, or reward themselves with riches.  Like money could make them happy.  Joe, was actually a miracle!  His abilities were what everyone dreams their computers could be.  Imagine a computer that could do all of that!  If there ever existed a society that was perfectly ethical, Joe could have helped them develop even more and perhaps become the greatest society ever.  But, I don’t know of any society in the history of the world that was ever that ethically good.  Instead, societies use the resources they have for good and bad.  Besides, criminals don’t need a computer to tell them how to commit crimes. They figure it out themselves.  Computers might supply them more ideas or help to create better diabolical plans.  Again, computers are just a tool that could be bad or good. Good and bad have always existed with or without computers.

Another point to be made is the fact that in their story, they couldn’t turn off all the Logics because society had been built on them.  Our society as well, has been built on the foundation of computers.  We can’t just stop using them. That would be like telling a diabetic to stop using insulin. Everything we use daily would stop working-literally.  No more using credit cards at the grocery store, no more going to the doctors and having them bring up your history with a click of a mouse, no more smart phones!  It would be like living on a new planet, where you actually had to write on paper, or go to the library. How inconvenient!  

I see how computers influence each one of us. They are a part of our lives and we take them for granted a lot of the time. Good and bad have come from them, but the computers aren’t the problem, it’s us, the people, who need to check our moral system.

Module 9 Chps. 13-17

We’re finally done reading the Friedman book!  What a relief, I’m stoked to write about something else, other than “The World Is Flat”.  Not that it wasn’t interesting, but there were some pages that I wasn’t exactly thrilled to read.  But in these last chapters of the book, Friedman makes some good points that made me think about the future of the flat world.

To get started with the questions.  How is a Dell Laptop built?  Well, the supply chain is gigantic, and the process is all articulately organized down to minutes.  It starts with the customer’s order.  Dell receives the order and then sends a message to one of its six factories around the world.  The factory, then sends a message to its suppliers of what they need and how much of it they need.  Those suppliers respond and immediately work to fill the order.  The order is filled and sent to a Dell factory where the parts are put together to meet customer’s needs (software and hardware specifications).  When done, the laptop is shipped to the customer. The customer receives the laptop, signs the papers and the process is repeated again with more customers.  Did I mention, that Dell sells 140,000 to 150,000 a day (Friedman 581)?  Making that many computers in a day is no simple feat.  Those laptops have over 30 key components in them and Dell uses multiple suppliers, just in case one a supplier cannot make the count.  Not to mention that those suppliers aren’t always close to each other geographically. Their supply chain is mind-boggling, but it runs like clockwork.

Next question. Does Al-Qaeda have a supply chain?  Friedman argues that it does. He argues that Al-Qaeda advertises and recruits through the internet.  The internet makes it so that even when terrorists are hiding in caves, they can still make a big impact on people through what they choose to post on the internet.  The internet is where they advertise for donations, or recruitments, or just to send a message of fear to others.  They use the flat world technology to destroy the flat world!  Computers, hardware, software, everything in the flat world is just a tool.  And those tools can be used for anything, including making a bunch of money or wreaking world havoc.  I liked a quote from a chapter that said “Democracy is great, but democracy without responsibility is truly frightening” (Friedman 527).  Computers are like our own personal freedom.  We can upload what we’d like.  We all have the same rights to upload what we want, but when we upload irresponsibly, it’s frightening.  Computers can either be a great tool to build good things, or a tool that acts more like a weapon, destroying what others have built up.

Last question.  What is the curse of oil?  Countries who have lots of oil oftentimes struggle to “develop real institutions, property rights, rule of law, independent courts, modern education, foreign trade, foreign investment, freedom of thought, and scientific inquiry to get the most out of their men and women”(Friedman 626).  This is because oil is a big source of money for the government officials in countries such as Venezuela, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, and Iran.  If these countries aren’t taxing the public, they don’t have to tell the public what they are doing with the money.  And the public doesn’t really benefit from the money either.  On the opposite of the spectrum are countries that aren’t oil rich.  These countries need to tax the working men and women for money.  And when they tax the public, the government needs to explain how that money will be used to benefit the people.  Whether it is used towards education, law, etc.  Since the county can’t rely on oil, it needs to be good at producing other things in a competitive way.  There is more motivation to develop the country, because the money doesn’t come out of the ground, it comes through the educated ideas of self-motivated persons.

In summary, the book opened up ideas to me that I had never thought of before relating to technology, especially computers and the internet. I feel both excited and fearful for the future in technology.  It seems to me that technology can be used for good or bad, and since we the users control what we do with it, we should think about what ways we would like to use computers for good.

Module 8

Module 8

As I grew up in the 90’s computers were in my life.  I used them for gaming, surfing the web, homework, and shopping. I continue to use them today. Much of my time spent on the computer is for homework these days.  I also like my social media, and email. If it wasn’t for social media or email, I wouldn’t write as many people as I do. And I would't know how they were doing either.  I was never much of a letter writer, but I will instant message family and friends.  It is much faster than the regular postal service since I can send and receive messages within seconds and the postman delivers within days or weeks. Besides the social aspects of computes, I find computers very helpful as they allow me to create things very fast.  Typing allows me to write fast. I type faster than I write on paper.  I can use PowerPoint, Photoshop, Excel, and many other software applications to create what I want and how I want it with little effort on my part.  I command the computer to do what I want and the computer obeys me.  Since everything is digital, I am able to send what I create with others.  

The internet is also something I take advantage of.  My computer would be a lot less fun without it.  I use the internet for everything. I will never get on my computer without connecting myself to the internet (unless I am just using word documents, but even then I wind up on the internet).  The internet is where everything is at.  I literally have access to information at the stroke of my keyboard. I type what I would like to know and Google or other search engines give me the information I request.  This is very convenient for me, I don’t have to leave my house to go to my local library or search through old newspapers.  I can do a search for the most bizarre things and something is likely to come up. The search is instant! The information doesn’t take long to load, and I can learn quickly.

When it comes to computers in my education, I am all for them. Because sometimes you don’t realize what you have until it’s gone. Just this semester I had a Psychology class where my professor didn’t use any technology. I felt like I was back in elementary school where everything was printed out and I took notes with a pencil and paper! My professor didn’t use power-points or even Canvas! I wanted to point out to my professor that we were living in the year 2015 and that computers are actually quite helpful in education, even though you don’t need a computer to learn. I was quite bored in class because there wasn’t a lot of visual material to look at and I had to listen to the lecture the whole two hours of class. It was difficult to not fall asleep.  I feel more engaged with a PowerPoint, or a video to explain concepts. Since some people learn more with pictures or words and others with noise, technology can do both.

In my senior year of high school all of my math and science classes had smart boards. We didn’t even use old-fashioned whiteboards. We also had a clicker system that we could use to review for tests. A question would show up on the smart boards, we would answer using our clickers and then when everyone had answered the board would show the correct answer and how many people had chosen that answer and how many had chosen the wrong answer. It was awesome because the answers were seen instantly. Teachers could see what concepts needed to be reviewed and the whole class could review together.  It was also stimulating, you had to pay attention because nobody wanted to be that person who didn’t answer the question. Technology is awesome, and even though in my classes we don’t use smartboards, we do use computers and the internet. I also find it interesting that there are degrees that you can get online.  You won’t even need to go to school, because you could learn everything online at your home, using eBooks and the internet.  That’s how much technology has affected education.  And now that there is a teacher deficiency in many schools, I predict that even more kids will use computers towards their education. 

Module 7 Chapters 10-13

Well, we read chapters 10-13 in the Friedman book. And like in the rest of the chapters, Friedman is still explaining the flat world and globalization.  In chapters 10-13 he focuses on what makes some countries succeed and others fail.  He mentions self-directed consumers, and if globalization means Americanization. Let’s begin the analysis.

First question, why are some countries or regions better at doing some things than other countries or regions?  Well, that’s a good question and there really is not just one aspect that makes or breaks the economic success of countries.  Friedman explains “climate, natural resources, and geography all help to explain why some countries are able to make the leap to industrialization and others are not, the key factor is actually a country’s cultural endowments, particularly the degree to which it has internalized the values of hard work, thrift, honesty, patience, and tenacity, as well as the degree to which it is open to change, new technology, and equality for women (Friedman 421).”  It doesn’t matter if the country has a physical advantage, what matters most is the culture.  And the interesting thing is that culture is adjustable.  It can change with time.  It changes as leaders and media adjust and when child-rearing, education, and religion change to new circumstances.  So what is a “good” culture?  A kind of culture that is open-minded.  A culture that doesn’t judge based on race or gender, but that judges on talent and ability. These types of cultures seem to reap the greatest rewards argues Friedman.  Because they are open to change, they are open to new ideas, and new technologies.  They don’t limit the potential of others, and they don’t mind working with people who aren’t similar to them in terms of culture, or skin color, or sex. The results of working with others, actually pays off and countries move up the ladder. For example, countries that don’t limit women to the home have more educated people in the workforce and it doesn’t give the men the idea that they were just born to be entitled to everything.  Men don’t have the competitive edge if they already feel like they are better than every women (Friedman 423).  Friedman also writes that good governance, education, infrastructure, and the ability to glocalize affect the success of countries.  Countries should have the right laws, otherwise they won’t compete well.  They should also have a good education system which teaches students math and science—to better excel with technology discoveries. Also, countries need to have a good transportation system with roads, airports, etc.  I could write more on this, but I’ll keep it as is.

What is a self-directed consumer?  Consumers enjoy the feeling of getting what they want and how they want it. A self-directed consumer gets to “call the shots”.  They set the price and the service they’d like.  The internet makes this easy.  For example, I go online shopping for snowshoes.  I look at the store websites and they offer me check boxes of which brands I’d like to browse or what style I am looking for at what price.  There are more checkboxes for the color and size I’d like them to be.   So instead of feeling overwhelmed with all the available options, I can minimize my search and just look at the snowshoes that interest me, and the search becomes more manageable. I am a self-directed consumer, and anybody else who shops online is also.  Companies want you to tell them what you want, they encourage their buyers to be self-directed.  That’s why those checkboxes exist in the first place.  And these days, it’s easy and simple to shop more directly.  You enter in what you want, the computer process it, and gives you what you asked for.

Last question, does globalization mean Americanization?  Not necessarily.  The argument after the Berlin wall was that America was King of the globalization.  “This worry was not unreasonable, because it was primarily American-based manufacturers and service providers, American brands and American moviemakers, American singers and American entertainers, American clothing designers and American fast-food chains that were in the best position to take advantage of the falling of the walls and flattening of the world” (Friedman 477).  It’s 2015 now, and the world has changed!  It’s not all American any more.  And the internet gives freedom to express one’s culture.  Practically anyone who lives anywhere with internet can upload what they’d like: recipes, podcasts, movies, etc.  They don’t even have to speak English. I agree that culture changes, so maybe more into the future other countries will pick up some American culture, but they won’t lose their own.  What I can maybe predict is more appreciation for culture in the future.  When you see how other people live, you see the good and the bad of their culture, but you respect them more, when you understand them. 

                To conclude, the world globalization isn’t stopping, it is picking up speed.  There is no way we can stop it.  It is neither 100% good nor 100% bad.  But what we should be realizing is how it affects us and what we are going to do about that.  

Module 6

Free-Trade

I am not studying economics by any means, but I personally like the idea of free-trade in America.  Free trade is a policy followed by some international markets in which countries' governments do not restrict imports from, or exports to, other countries.  It also includes offshoring.  With everything else in the world, there is a good side and a bad side to free-trade.  The bad side is that if there are no limits to what America can import or export, then it would be legal to offshore and outsource American jobs.  People become unemployed when they lose their job, and if too many people are unemployed, then America enters into a recession or even worse, a depression. But, the good side to free trade is that without restrictions, America can trade their goods with countries who will buy those goods, thus keeping Americans employed. As long as those goods stay at a low price.  Friedman argues that if America can’t supply low cost goods, at least we can supply good ideas that can be sold for a price.  Also, because technology is always advancing, the educated people in math and science will have an advantage over others who don’t have that background.  Basically the whole world is competing against each other and the smartest people will come out on top.  

The New-Middlers

Even though much of technology is outsourcing or overtaking middle class jobs, not all middle class jobs will be outsourced. Middle class jobs that require a physical body presence cannot be replaced, even by the smartest computer. Also, jobs that require very specific knowledge or specialization won’t be put onto the chopping block.  But Friedman argues that middle class jobs are evolving.  The new middle class jobs that will exist in the flat future will require something different from the past.  Friedman calls the new middle class workers “the new middlers” (Friedman 285).  So what skills would new middlers need to have in order to survive in the future?  Friedman describes seven characteristics that could save the middle class.  They will need to be good leaders.  They will need to collaborate and orchestrate well with other others; they’ll need to synthesize and be good at explaining different concepts, and be good adaptors as well. Going green will also be a benefit for them, since the new flat world will be extremely detrimental when everyone is trying to get at the earth’s resources.  In addition to those characteristics, the new middlers should be curious and have a passion for whatever motivates them to learn.

CQ + PQ > IQ

What does CQ + PQ > IQ mean?  Basically Friedman says that it is more important for a person to have curiosity and passion than to be intelligent.  Don’t get me wrong, it is good to be smart, but it is even better to be curious and passionate.  Don’t we all learn more and pay more attention to subjects that we actually like to learn about?  When we have an interest it motivates us to dig deeper.  To learn something on a deeper level, there has to be motivation.  For me, I fall asleep in chemistry, but I’m more eager to learn about psychology and math.  Since I already have an interest in them, I can then build off of that and learn more than a person who isn’t interested at all.  This is true for everyone and it is a good thing because everyone has different interests.  It is also very important that people learn whenever and wherever they can.  The classroom is not the only place to learn something new, it is just a very formal way to educate a large group of people. Learning can come from any source, including the internet.  Especially now that there is so much information to be found on the web, people can self-educate themselves  about a variety of different topics.  Granted, information on the internet can be untruthful.   And the reader needs to read with caution, but the internet is still a good resource for learning. 

Module 5

IST Module 5 Pgs. 200-259

What is the triple convergence? It’s the convergence of all three globalizations and all 10 world flatteners.  Its outcome means that people from everywhere in the world can compete with each other because now, there is information at their fingertips and governments are allowing them to compete.  The countries that were held back by their governments were places like China, India, Russia, Eastern Europe, Latin America, and central Asia.  In the 1990’s and through those years those same countries were opening up more and more to world trade.  Companies that were once restricted by laws to freely trade with other countries now had more freedom to trade, create, and share ideas with each other like never before. Friedman says “three billion people who had been locked out of the field suddenly found themselves liberated to plug and play with everybody else” (210).  That’s a big deal since it means change for countries that didn’t have much competition before.  Those countries now have to compete against new teams for the gold medal.  And since other countries are now developing more, they can stay in their home country to compete against their rivals.

In the case of India versus Indiana: the story goes like this: Indiana was in dire need of help.  Their computer system that processed unemployment claims needed an upgrade. So what Indiana did was look for people who could help them revamp their system.  The cheapest people that offered to help were Indians from Asia.  So, Indiana outsourced their unemployment system to India.  Kind of ironic right?  The Asian Indians told Indiana that they would bring in about 65 of their own people to work with the Indiana Government Center and they would also team up with a few of the local subcontractors from Indiana.  By working together they would come up with the best computer system for their needs, which would speed up unemployment claims, and save on postage.   The Indians would get paid for their work and the locals from Indiana would save precious tax dollars that could be used in a more beneficial way. It was a win-win situation for everybody right?  Well the Indiana Democrats didn’t think the same way. They decided to break it off with India and hire locals to piece the system together.  The question posed here is who was exploiting whom?  Was Indiana exploiting India’s cheap labor and high quality, or was India exploiting Indiana by offering to help them at an affordable rate?  The black and white lines of exploitation are gray in the new flat world. Which leads us to the next topic: Who owns what (Friedman)?

            The flat world poses new challenges than the challenges that existed in the old world.  Because it is so fast and easy to share ideas and information, it is now harder to take credit for your own ideas, especially if others take them and add on or counterfeit them.  For example, Friedman explains “The PC is the product of a lot of cross-licensing between the company that had the patent on the cursor and the company that had the patent on the mouse and the screen” (254).  The patents need to come together to make one product - the PC.  Patents are good in a sense that it allows individuals to protect their new and useful inventions and to reap the rewards of their product.  But with the whole world competing, it’s hard to keep a patented item from being stolen and replicated because not every country has the same patent laws.  Friedman writes a quote from Craig Mundie “you should assume that there isn’t anything that can’t be counterfeited quickly” from Microsoft Word to airplane parts (254).  The flat world has conflicting desires.  It desires to share ideas and collaborate with others to make a product great, but it also desires the credit of making the product and the power to decide who gets to use the product and for what purpose the product was indented for.  

            Honestly competition is getting fiercer around the world because there are now many people who have the skills and the tools to compete against each other.  The companies with the lowest prices and highest quality will come out on top in the end, even if it does mean that those companies cut employee benefits down so that the state picks of the tab. Like with the example of Walmart.

Module 4

IT Job

The more popular technology gets, the more help we sometimes need using it.   Because computers are vulnerable to viruses and other malware, they don’t work well when they are “sick”.  This can be very detrimental for businesses or other companies that rely on their computers to work properly.  If something goes wrong with the computers, companies want someone who knows how to fix it.  That’s where the IT (information technology) guys and gals come in.  IT specialists are trained in computer processes.  They know the ins and outs of computers and they know how to take good care of them.  They are like the doctors of computers.  When something goes wrong, you call the IT guys.

            My Aunt Kathy is the technology and IT specialist for the Malad, Idaho Library. She maintains all of the 11 public computers and 8 more staff computers.  She installs all software programs, troubleshoots the problems, maintains the anti-spyware, and installs all of the peripheral devices like printers and scanners.  In other words, she keeps the library’s network running smoothly.   When asked what she liked most about her job, she said “I enjoy loading a computer and having it work properly for the public” (Kent).  And the public also likes a computer that runs smoothly.  The hardest thing she said she had ever done was recover data from a computer crash (Kent).  There seems to be a sense of fulfillment when complicated problems get solved, and the IT guys are always solving problems with computers.

            The question that may be on your mind is how much money do IT specialists make?  According to the U.S bureau of labor statistics government website the average annual wage of an IT specialist in 2012 was $48,900 per year and $23.51 per hour.  Of course wages and salaries vary depending on where you work and what company you work for, so don’t judge too quickly.  If you are thinking that you want to take the IT route, then stay in school.  The average level of education is a bachelor's degree.  When you do get your degree, there are many options available to you.   IT jobs are everywhere there are computers involved, you could wind up working at a hospital, library, or business company, the possibilities are multiple. Computers are flattening the world so much, they aren’t going to fade away in our life time.  The job outlook for IT jobs is good.  Jobs in this field are expected to grow at a rate of 12% by 2020.  

            If you don’t think an IT specialist job is the job for you, there are many more jobs that work with computers.  Web designers, computer programmers, and data specialists all work with computers, and they all do different things with them.  IT specialists fix computer problems, but their job description isn’t designing web pages, programming software applications, or securing a database. Those jobs are completed by web designers, computer programmers, and data specialists.  And there are more jobs than those!    You can probably tell there are many facets of computers.  Computers are complex, and there seems to be a job for all of their complexities. That can be good since it creates more job opportunities for not only Americans, but people all over the world.

            I am very happy that IT specialists can help me with my computer problems.  Whenever I have had a problem with something they have been eager to help me get it solved.  Whether the problem is related to the internet or my computer’s operating system, IT people have saved me a lot of stress and worry over my work and personal computers.

             Bibliography

"Summary." U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 8 Jan. 2014.

Web. 01 Oct. 2015. http://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-

technology/computer-support-specialists.htm.

Kent, Kathy. E-mail interview. 28 Sept. 2015.